Re: [office-accessibility] ODF Accessibility SC meeting

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 21/02/07, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>  Regarging our guidelines, what is left is to review Suann Nichols comments.
> I know that at least Peter, Janina, and I believe the requirement to
> duplicate the ATAG format should not be done at this time. We could consider
> it for ODF 1.2. I am not sure what others think but I threw that out for
> people to consider if we in fact prefer an ATAG format.

Unless we have format complaints, I see no reason to follow ATAG.

>
>  If someone is willing to review Suann's comments outside those that are
> ATAG reforming related I would greatly appreciated.


I'll take a look today Rich (instead of phoning!)

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk