[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] ODF Accessibility SC meeting
Hi guys, I'm in Europe this week, and unable to chair our meeting. So... I think we skip this week and look to meet next week. Peter > Thanks to both of you for offering to review Susan's comments. > > I will be traveling Thusday and will not be able chair Thursday's > meeting. Perhaps Peter can chair if the need is there. > > However, if either of you have a response to Suann's comments I will > read them on the plane and provide feedback. Most people have agreed > that we should not follow ATAG format at this time. Mike, do you agree > with this? It would require a major rewrite. > > I actually think we are close to a second draft we can send to the > technical writer if all the action items are into Peter and the changes > needed to address Suann are minimal. > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist > Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer > Inactive hide details for "Mike Paciello" > <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com>"Mike Paciello" <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com> > > > *"Mike Paciello" <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com>* > > 02/21/2007 03:53 PM > Please respond to > <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com> > > > > To > > Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > > cc > > > Subject > > RE: [office-accessibility] ODF Accessibility SC meeting > > > > > I'll take a stab at reviewing Susan's comments Rich. > > -Mike > > Mike Paciello, TPG > Cell: +1 603.566.7713 > e-mail: _mpaciello@paciellogroup.com_ <mailto:mpaciello@paciellogroup.com> > web: _www.paciellogroup.com_ <http://www.paciellogroup.com/> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] * > Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:44 PM* > To:* office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org* > Subject:* [office-accessibility] ODF Accessibility SC meeting > > There will be no ODF Accessibility SC meeting tomorrow. > > Peter is waiting on changes for people's sections due to Becky Gibson's > comments. For those who have turned in their sections - thank you. > > We plan on having a meeting before CSUN. > > Regarging our guidelines, what is left is to review Suann Nichols > comments. I know that at least Peter, Janina, and I believe the > requirement to duplicate the ATAG format should not be done at this > time. We could consider it for ODF 1.2. I am not sure what others think > but I threw that out for people to consider if we in fact prefer an ATAG > format. > > If someone is willing to review Suann's comments outside those that are > ATAG reforming related I would greatly appreciated. > > Cheers, > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist > Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board > blog: _http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer_ >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]