OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-accessibility message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office] How to add animations for shapes on master pages


Hi Dave,

[moving just to the SC mailing list]

Indeed, your example of the animated graph is a good one.  On the flip 
side, you can imagine something like the animated logo of a company (vs. 
the static image logo of that same company), or images of tweeting birds 
in the background of a presentation on ornithology.  The animation 
itself contains no semantic meaning - it is decorative.  It is, perhaps, 
one step above the interstitial slide animations, where one slide wipes 
left to the other, vs. irising open. vs...

What I think we need to do is ensure the format provides a means to 
convey at least a text description of the animation meaning, and to 
write guidelines that help authors decide when they should use it.  That 
of course means we need author guidelines (vs. authoring tool guidelines).


Regards,

Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

> On 12/09/2007, Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@sun.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> We should discuss animation accessibility soon in our SC - perhaps at
>> our next meeting.  Questions we should explore include ways to tag the
>> animation with ALT text descriptions, suggested UI for authors to do
>> this, guidelines for when animations should be so tagged (does every
>> animation need a description?  is there a way to indicate
>> 'non-informational/decorative animations' as such, so the user knows
>> they exist and knows they needn't care about them), etc.
>>     
>
>
> The only experience I have is with SVG.
> The bottom line is that the animated item (generally as a whole)
> may or may not transmit information. E.g. A graph, rising from 20% through
> to 80% indicating sales over period x to y.
>
> If it's done on SVG, then there is room to provide alternative formats,
> svg:text or title.
>
> IMHO that's as low as we'd want to go.
>
> We'd need a default, yuk, the equivalent of the empty alt text, which indicated
> that this is ... you think of a bad example, i.e. decorative graphics.
>
> Rich, Janina, anyone. What have I missed please.
>
> HTH
>
>
>
>
>
>   



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]