[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Re: The third para in 4.4 of ODF 1.0
Mokoto, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote: > Patrick, > > Sorry for my abrupt mail. Yes, I was talking about > the sentence "In addition to Sections can contain regular > text content or the text can be contained in another file > and linked to the section". I do not understand what is the > subject of this sentence. > > Is is ok if we simply omit "In addition"? > > Sure, that clarifies it as well but my personal preference (subject to the TC's approval) would be to re-cast as I suggested earlier. Oh, but from a translation perspective, I suppose the least change possible is the best change possible. Yes? Hope you are having a great day! Patriick > Cheers, > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]