[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] About this mailing list
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:32 AM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: > marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote on 03/02/2009 08:17:48 AM: > > If you read the context further, you'll see that this is only a > requirement for comments received during a public review draft, during a > public review. Correct. I have already acknowledged my error in that regard and apologized for it. > You can see how our work in tracking each legitimate public review comment > is made more difficult if the signal/noise ratio on this list is low. It > also frustrating for the person who joins the list to submit a comment, > stays on the list for a day or two for an acknowledgement, and then is > deluged with dozens of heated posts debating the nature of > interoperability. We need to respect the purpose of this list. Intending no disrespect, I have seen no heated posts on this list so far nor have I seen "dozens" of posts "debating the nature of interoperability," heated or not. I believe I can work within the limits Mary identified. But I do not understand how you expect me to behave if you intend that I exercise stricter self-control than what Mary specified. Best regards, Paul E. Merrell, J.D. (Marbux) -- Universal Interoperability Council <http:www.universal-interop-council.org>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]