[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] NUMBERTEXT as well as / instead of BAHTTEXT
Andreas J Guelzow wrote: > > If we don't have a generic NUMBERTEXT function (and I follow your > > argument of this being very difficult to specify) I don't think we > > should have a BAHTTEXT function either. Virtually all arguments you make > > also apply to a potential plethora of individual functions and I don't > > see how Thai is in any way special. > Eike replied: > BAHTTEXT exists in Excel and we try to be interoperable with Excel where > reasonable. Which is the reason to be in for quite a few functions we > otherwise would had dropped. I don't insist on having BAHTTEXT in ODFF, > I'd also be fine without, OOo would store it as COM.MICROSOFT.BAHTTEXT > then. It wouldn't just be OOo, that'd be true for be any OpenFormula implementation. > So, as BAHTTEXT seems to give unnecessary headaches, let's drop it. I'm fine with that. Anyone against? --- David A. Wheeler
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]