[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] WEEKNUM reference
Hi David, On Friday, 2007-02-23 13:14:14 -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote: > Eike Rathke: > > I still don't see how that's meant. Maybe a misunderstanding from mixing > > absolute and simple weeks. From my understanding the definitions are: > > > > 1. Absolute week, as used by US military: > > The first 7 days of a year are the first week, regardless of the > > day-of-week the year started with, days 8-14 are the second week, and > > so on. This would be covered with a 2nd argument of 0. > > Yes, I completely agree with that entire description, both cases. I was trying to restate case 1 as a definition; I _believe_ that case 1 is described by this relationship: > > > WEEKNUM(x;0) == WEEKNUM(x; WEEKDAY(DATE(1;1;YEAR(x))) > if "case 1" and the relationship aren't the same, I don't know why (it'd be worth clarifying if they ARE different, that might reveal something important). They are dfferent simply because WEEKDAY(DATE(YEAR(x);1;1)) returns a number between 1 and 7. Eike -- Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements of spreadsheets. --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]