[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Test Case Data for SUMPRODUCT() (Section 6.4.5)
--ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, On Friday, 2009-02-13 00:01:26 +0000, Eric Patterson wrote: > One of the test cases listed for the SUMPRODUCT() function is as follows: >=20 > =3DSUMPRODUCT([.A41:.C43];[.A41:.C43]) >=20 > The test case data in section 2.4 doesn't have any data in cells A1:C43. = What is expected here? Indeed, there's something missing. Several functions' test cases refer data in the range A41:N43, i.e. MDETERM, MINVERSE, MMULT, MUNIT, SUMPRODUCT, SUMX2MY2, SUMX2PY2, SUMXMY2 and TRANSPOSE, one may easily check searching with the regular expression \[\..4.:\..4.\] That seems to had been matrix test case data. Also earlier and very early revisions of the draft are lacking it. The matrix functions' test cases using it were introduced with revision 19 of the draft, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20175/openformula-2006090= 6.odt David, could you dig out who contributed that and maybe where the data was lost during transfer and whether it could be retrieved? If not, we'd have to create a new data set and adapt test cases using it. Eike --=20 Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statem= ents of spreadsheets. --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's = list. --ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJlay4Zcn5tYf41BIRApouAKC0DujjX4ylqGtKQaXnqm3Ky8zyywCgw3oI v7aCT+sFMPkGt1HMz17ztYA= =Sfpz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]