[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Question on character classes
Eike, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On Saturday, 2009-12-19 11:34:34 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote: > > >> Whirring away on untangling the portability portions but curious about >> the use of XML character classes. >> >> Makes sense if we are talking about XML text, makes less sense if we are >> talking about strings in general. Just use Unicode character classes >> with the correct references. >> >> Was there some overt reason for choosing XML character classes? >> > > What exactly are you talking about? Is this about LetterXML, DigitXML, > ... in the syntax definitions, referring XML10 > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ appendix B Character Classes? > > Yes. > What would be the equivalent Unicode classes? > > Well, for DigitXML that would be Decimal digits in the Unicode Character Database. I haven't compared the latest DigitXML to Decimal digits in the most recent UCD so there may not be a significant difference. My main concern was if we are talking about supporting the full range of characters in Unicode (or at least providing implementations with that option) when rather than citing the XML standard and using Unicode by indirection, we could also simply cite the Unicode standard. On the other hand, it may be that the XML summaries on these character classes are at least as easy to specify as their Unicode counterparts and nearly as complete. Hope you are at the start of a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]