OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
office-formula
172 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [office-formula] Punctuation issues
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 28 Dec 2009 20:06:06 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Punctuation issues
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 28 Dec 2009 17:25:38 -0000
Re: [office-formula] PRICEMAT
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 28 Dec 2009 17:13:40 -0000
Re: [office-formula] salvage
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 28 Dec 2009 16:20:43 -0000
Re: [office-formula] AVEDEV
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 27 Dec 2009 21:16:43 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Style for Function Descriptions
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 27 Dec 2009 07:20:48 -0000
Re: [office-formula] AVEDEV
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 26 Dec 2009 22:50:03 -0000
AVEDEV
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 26 Dec 2009 21:20:32 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Style for Function Descriptions
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 26 Dec 2009 20:41:58 -0000
Style for Function Descriptions
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 26 Dec 2009 20:12:35 -0000
LINEST
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 26 Dec 2009 18:42:56 -0000
FLOOR
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 26 Dec 2009 16:09:10 -0000
IMSEC
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 26 Dec 2009 14:17:19 -0000
SECH out of order
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 26 Dec 2009 13:38:11 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Difference on ACCRINT?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 24 Dec 2009 19:49:23 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Difference on ACCRINT?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 24 Dec 2009 17:11:43 -0000
Re: [office-formula] MIRR
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 24 Dec 2009 02:46:32 -0000
Difference on ACCRINT?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 24 Dec 2009 01:25:20 -0000
Posted the spreadsheet on financial functions
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 24 Dec 2009 01:16:29 -0000
Re: [office-formula] MIRR
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 24 Dec 2009 00:40:40 -0000
Re: [office-formula] NPV
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 24 Dec 2009 00:36:03 -0000
Yield and AnnualYield
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 19:40:52 -0000
RE: [office-formula] frequency
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 18:55:13 -0000
RE: [office-formula] frequency
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Dec 2009 18:41:35 -0000
Re: [office-formula] NPV
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 18:38:37 -0000
Re: [office-formula] MIRR
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 18:34:19 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Fv, the parameter Pv
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 18:26:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] DB question
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 18:15:20 -0000
RRI
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 16:49:43 -0000
NPV
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 16:15:25 -0000
MIRR
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 16:08:06 -0000
IRR
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 16:04:48 -0000
FV
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 16:01:57 -0000
IMPT
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 15:42:13 -0000
Fv, the parameter Pv
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 15:25:20 -0000
Punctuation issues
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 15:06:17 -0000
PRICEMAT
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 14:53:31 -0000
salvage
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 14:53:07 -0000
DB question
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 13:04:28 -0000
RE: [office-formula] "settlement The settlement date." - DISAPPEAR IT
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Dec 2009 05:32:29 -0000
RE: [office-formula] frequency
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Dec 2009 03:53:23 -0000
RE: [office-formula] frequency
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Dec 2009 02:11:15 -0000
Re: [office-formula] "settlement The settlement date."
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 00:40:14 -0000
Re: [office-formula] frequency
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Dec 2009 00:14:31 -0000
RE: [office-formula] 48 bits?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Dec 2009 00:07:26 -0000
RE: [office-formula] frequency
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 22 Dec 2009 22:55:44 -0000
RE: [office-formula] "settlement The settlement date."
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 22 Dec 2009 22:30:33 -0000
Re: [office-formula] "settlement The settlement date."
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 22 Dec 2009 21:30:29 -0000
frequency
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 21:30:11 -0000
COUPNUM, COUPPCD
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 20:50:36 -0000
"settlement The settlement date."
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 20:47:57 -0000
COUPNCD
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 20:42:11 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091221(OpenDocument-formula-20091221.odt) uploaded
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 22 Dec 2009 19:43:00 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification 2009-12-22 (ODT) (OpenDocument-formula-20091222.odt) uploaded
From
erack@sun.com on 22 Dec 2009 19:26:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Question on character classes
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 22 Dec 2009 17:32:56 -0000
Summary of 2009-12-22 teleconference
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 22 Dec 2009 16:09:16 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability and conformance
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 22 Dec 2009 15:05:20 -0000
Re: [office-formula] 48 bits?
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 22 Dec 2009 15:02:07 -0000
48 bits?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 14:46:43 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability and conformance
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 22 Dec 2009 14:18:52 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability and conformance
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 22 Dec 2009 13:44:48 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091221 (OpenDocument-formula-20091221.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 22 Dec 2009 01:32:06 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Question on character classes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 21 Dec 2009 13:42:32 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability and conformance
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 21 Dec 2009 13:36:39 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability and conformance
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 21 Dec 2009 13:07:48 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Question on character classes
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 21 Dec 2009 13:00:59 -0000
Portability and conformance
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 19 Dec 2009 21:07:06 -0000
Question on character classes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 19 Dec 2009 16:34:56 -0000
Re: [office-formula] IMSUM
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 17 Dec 2009 11:39:01 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Do definitions vary?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 16 Dec 2009 22:37:19 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Do definitions vary?
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 16 Dec 2009 22:29:46 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 16 Dec 2009 22:22:41 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 16 Dec 2009 22:00:44 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 16 Dec 2009 21:39:25 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 16 Dec 2009 15:16:13 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 16 Dec 2009 14:56:08 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Dec 2009 14:38:07 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 16 Dec 2009 14:28:07 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 16 Dec 2009 13:04:10 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 16 Dec 2009 09:34:10 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 16 Dec 2009 04:49:54 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 16 Dec 2009 02:24:58 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Portable "documents" - base targets
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 15 Dec 2009 22:07:32 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 15 Dec 2009 21:36:55 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 15 Dec 2009 16:25:26 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 15 Dec 2009 14:24:58 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable "documents"
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 15 Dec 2009 14:16:46 -0000
Portable "documents"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 15 Dec 2009 13:59:44 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Synonym?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 15 Dec 2009 01:20:50 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Synonym?
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 14 Dec 2009 21:27:16 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Synonym?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 14 Dec 2009 20:33:51 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Synonym?
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 14 Dec 2009 18:31:43 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Propagation of errors
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 14 Dec 2009 18:26:40 -0000
Re: [office-formula] OFFICE-2224: better description for TBILLEQ,native speaker needed
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 14 Dec 2009 10:59:54 -0000
Re: [office-formula] OFFICE-2224: better description for TBILLEQ,native speaker needed
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 13 Dec 2009 21:45:38 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Synonym?
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 12 Dec 2009 22:58:57 -0000
Synonym?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 12 Dec 2009 22:26:02 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091211 (OpenDocument-formula-20091211.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 11 Dec 2009 21:51:28 -0000
Re: [office-formula] General question (not yet a JIRA issue)
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Dec 2009 21:22:35 -0000
Re: [office-formula] General question (not yet a JIRA issue)
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 11 Dec 2009 19:32:34 -0000
Re: [office-formula] General question (not yet a JIRA issue)
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Dec 2009 18:28:33 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Propagation of errors
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 11 Dec 2009 16:34:32 -0000
Re: [office-formula] General question (not yet a JIRA issue)
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 11 Dec 2009 16:31:36 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Propagation of errors
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 11 Dec 2009 16:27:16 -0000
Re: [office] Re: [office-formula] BITAND - Normative Statements
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Dec 2009 16:06:12 -0000
General question (not yet a JIRA issue)
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Dec 2009 14:17:28 -0000
Propagation of errors
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Dec 2009 14:11:49 -0000
Re: [office-formula] BITAND - Normative Statements
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 11 Dec 2009 07:31:51 -0000
Re: [office-formula] BITAND
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 11 Dec 2009 07:24:34 -0000
RE: [office-formula] BITAND
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Dec 2009 02:36:20 -0000
Re: [office-formula] BITAND - Normative Statements
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 22:50:18 -0000
RE: [office-formula] BITAND - Normative Statements
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 10 Dec 2009 20:39:10 -0000
RE: [office-formula] BITAND
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 10 Dec 2009 19:17:27 -0000
RE: [office-formula] BITAND
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 10 Dec 2009 19:04:44 -0000
Re: [office-formula] BITAND
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca> on 10 Dec 2009 18:01:14 -0000
Do definitions vary?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 16:52:35 -0000
IMSUM
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 14:24:10 -0000
Ordered comparison
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 13:33:33 -0000
BITAND
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 13:33:08 -0000
infix operator "<>"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 12:27:24 -0000
Infix Operator "="
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 12:18:06 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Dec 2009 11:07:42 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability"
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 10 Dec 2009 10:49:13 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Dec 2009 17:22:48 -0000
Minimal formula length (was: Conformance for documents?)
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 9 Dec 2009 12:24:36 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability"
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Dec 2009 11:24:49 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Dec 2009 10:24:52 -0000
Re: [office-formula] On "portability" (resend)
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Dec 2009 09:36:25 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conformance for documents? (resend)
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Dec 2009 09:36:02 -0000
Anchors and test cases
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 21:58:46 -0000
On "portability"
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 21:31:55 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conformance for documents?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Dec 2009 19:31:27 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Separation of concerns - Chapter 4
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Dec 2009 17:10:10 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Separation of concerns - Chapter 4 and Booleans too
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Dec 2009 17:10:07 -0000
Summary of 2009-12-08 teleconference
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 8 Dec 2009 16:31:46 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Supplemental on conformance for documents
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Dec 2009 15:35:54 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Separation of concerns - Chapter 4
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2009 14:54:28 -0000
Separation of concerns - Chapter 4
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 14:32:07 -0000
Re: [office-formula] recalculation model and chapter 3 generally
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2009 14:29:43 -0000
recalculation model and chapter 3 generally
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 14:07:29 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conformance for documents?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2009 14:01:47 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conformance for documents?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 13:36:45 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conformance for documents?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Dec 2009 13:10:44 -0000
Supplemental on conformance for documents
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 09:09:57 -0000
Conformance for documents?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Dec 2009 00:03:37 -0000
Treasure bills
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Dec 2009 22:31:58 -0000
Re: [office-formula] OFFICE-2224: better description for TBILLEQ,native speaker needed
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Dec 2009 22:20:11 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification 2009-12-04 (ODT) (OpenDocument-formula-20091204.odt) uploaded
From
erack@sun.com on 4 Dec 2009 22:05:58 -0000
OFFICE-2224: better description for TBILLEQ, native speaker needed
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 4 Dec 2009 21:58:43 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091202(OpenDocument-formula-20091202.odt) uploaded
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 4 Dec 2009 21:53:45 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091202 (OpenDocument-formula-20091202.odt) uploaded
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Dec 2009 19:15:52 -0000
Re: [office-formula] JIRA statistics
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Dec 2009 16:56:07 -0000
JIRA statistics
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 4 Dec 2009 16:30:35 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091202(OpenDocument-formula-20091202.odt) uploaded
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 4 Dec 2009 16:25:32 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 3 Dec 2009 17:22:58 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 3 Dec 2009 17:18:05 -0000
Re: [office-formula] DOLLAR?
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 3 Dec 2009 17:00:01 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-formula-20091202 (OpenDocument-formula-20091202.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 3 Dec 2009 16:49:03 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 2 Dec 2009 20:53:48 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2009 19:54:38 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 2 Dec 2009 19:19:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2009 17:29:17 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Dec 2009 15:41:42 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Cross-references
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Dec 2009 15:36:45 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Mathematical formulas - general
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2009 14:47:06 -0000
Re: [office-formula] euroconvert
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2009 14:46:59 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Cross-references
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2009 14:46:57 -0000
Cross-references
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Dec 2009 10:43:05 -0000
euroconvert
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Dec 2009 10:27:14 -0000
Mathematical formulas - general
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Dec 2009 01:07:12 -0000
DOLLAR?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 1 Dec 2009 22:21:57 -0000
Types, subtypes and pseudotypes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 1 Dec 2009 22:10:22 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2