Re: [office-metadata] Further examples needed

[Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>]

"Bruce D'Arcus" <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us> wrote on 03/09/2007 10:41:47
AM:

>
> On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>
> > Especially examples about the RDF manifest description using OWL,
> > instead using RelaxNG, to enable more flexibility for the future would
> > be helpful to change the current proposal.
>
> I'm not sure if Elias (?) meant to suggest we need something so formal
> in our proposal as an OWL ontology*, but we at minimum need a list of
> properties we'd consider a baseline.

An OWL ontology would just be the properties and maybe a class or two. No
biggie.

>
> Bruce
>
> * it seems to me we could just have that as supplement at the HTTP
> address the namespace URI would resolve to?

We could do that too.

-Elias

>