Re: [office-metadata] Further examples needed

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Hi Elias,

many thanks for your owl ontology.
I will exchange the existing RelaxNG schema of the RDF/XML metadata 
manifest against the owl ontology.

As we decided to write the manifest in RDF/XML, I assume the local names 
of the elements are taken from the RDF URIs, e.g. Manifest, ManifestEntry.
Shall we make these names similar to the existing manifest to avoid 
confusion, e.g. take over the XML names of the current proposal?

PS: Do you manage to give example(s) for the UUID binding you suggested 
on last call?

Again thanks for your help.
Svante

Elias Torres wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have attached and pasted here a draft of the OWL ontology needed for the
> manifest file. I think it captures everything from the current draft.
>
> TODO:
>
> - change NS URL to a proper one
> - review whether category is the right property name for classification
> - we are missing Named Graph URI
>
> <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
>     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/";
>     xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#";
>     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
>     xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";>
>
>     <owl:Ontology
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/";>
>         <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
>         <dc:title xml:lang="en">Open Document Format Metadata Manifest
> Ontology</dc:title>
>     </owl:Ontology>
>
>     <owl:Class
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#Manifest";>
>         <label>Manifest Class</label>
>     </owl:Class>
>
>     <owl:Class
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#ManifestEntry";>
>         <label>Manifest Entry Class</label>
>     </owl:Class>
>
>     <owl:ObjectProperty
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#entry";>
>         <label xml:lang="en">entry</label>
>         <subPropertyOf
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object"/>
>         <domain
> rdf:resource="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#Manifest"/>
>         <range
> rdf:resource="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#ManifestEntry"/>
>     </owl:ObjectProperty>
>
>     <owl:DatatypeProperty
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#full-path";>
>         <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty"/>
>         <comment xml:lang="en">the relative path to the metadata file
> within the package.</comment>
>         <domain
> rdf:resource="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#ManifestEntry"/>
>         <range
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal"/>
>         <label>file path</label>
>     </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>
>     <owl:DatatypeProperty
> rdf:about="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#category";>
>         <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty"/>
>         <comment xml:lang="en">a URI used to classify the metadata file to
> RDF applications.</comment>
>         <domain
> rdf:resource="http://opendocument.xml.org/2007/03/meta-manifest/ns/#ManifestEntry"/>
>         <range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"/>
>         <label>category</label>
>     </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>
> </rdf:RDF>
>
>
> (See attached file: meta-manifest.owl)
>
> -Elias
>
> Elias Torres/Somers/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 03/09/2007 01:05:17 PM:
>
>   
>> I'm supposed to provide some of these, sorry for the delay.
>>
>> -Elias
>>
>> Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM wrote on 03/09/2007 10:29:39 AM:
>>
>>     
>>> Before I can continue to edit our proposal, I am in need of the
>>> examples, that were announced on our last call.
>>> Especially examples about the RDF manifest description using OWL,
>>> instead using RelaxNG, to enable more flexibility for the future would
>>> be helpful to change the current proposal.
>>> But as well the promised examples about identification and versioning
>>> are required to bring our discussion further.
>>>
>>> A nice week-end to all of you,
>>> Svante.
>>>