Re: [office-metadata] Binding proposal(s) status for the call

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Elias Torres wrote:
> It is my opinion that we cannot proceed using relative
> URIs because we of explanations I already expressed on the list. I can't
> look for the email where I describe the issues with relative URIs and
> resolving URIs (for example:  "../../../content.xml" or ("/content.xml").
> We should not be creating a navigatable space within ODF because of
> Florian's concerns. We need to simply generate stable URIs for each of our
> elements and make statements about them. This is not about a base IRI or
> not. base IRI is only syntactic sugar, doesn't get at the heart of the
> problem.
>
> We should not be making statements in ODF based on the location of the
> document, that sounds insane to me.
>   

I am curious to know if the odf:/ URL be an alternative for you?

Svante.