OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-metadata message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office-metadata] meta-field and more...



"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote on 05/11/2007 09:37:40 AM:

>
> On May 11, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>
> > The reason to use a named graph as a placeholder for the file, was
> > to indirectly refer to the rdf:types of this file.
> >
> > <odf:Element odf:idref="id" rdf:about="uri:elementURI">
> >     <odf:belongsTo rdf:resource="http://someNamedGraph"/>
> > </odf:Element>
> >
> > <odf:MetaDataFile rdf:about="http://someNamedGraph";>
> >    <rdf:type rdf:resource="uri:citation-type"/>
> >    <rdf:type rdf:resource="uri:vcard-type"/>
> > </odf:MetaDataFile>
> >
> > As to me the same information set as
> >
> > <odf:Element odf:idref="id" rdf:about="uri:elementURI">
> >    <rdf:type rdf:resource="uri:citation-type"/>
> >    <rdf:type rdf:resource="uri:vcard-type"/>
> > </odf:Element>
> >
> >
> > The relation between a text:meta-field to a plug-in is information
> > required by all ODF applications and defining it improves
> > interoperability.
>
> For the citation case, why not:
>
> <odf:Element odf:idref="id" rdf:about="uri:elementURI"/>
>
> <b:Citation rdf:about="uri:elementURI">
>    ...
> </b:Citation>
>
> <odf:MetaDataFile rdf:about="http://someNamedGraph";>
>     <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://opendocument.org/Citation"/>
> </odf:MetaDataFile>
>
> ...?
>
> E.g. type the field itself.
>
> Bruce
>

Exactly what I suggested to Svante you would do. I stated that you have a
need and you would spec out what your implementors would do. You are
deciding to do solve your need via rdf:types. What we provide is the
extensible mechanism (thanks to RDF) to do so. Now, Svante wants the
general solution to that problem (which I believe exists and its needed)
but I think we would be going outside our responsibility and scope. I
suggested to Svante that it is a separate spec built on top of ODF metadata
that he and KOffice and others can agree.

I think we have a really good and tight (yet general) specification. Any
more specific ontology classes and predicates will be looking for trouble
and decisions that we might wish left for a later time.

-Elias



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]