Re: [office-metadata] final updates

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Jul 2, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:

>  The first sentence was never meant to be dropped and is still valid. 
> I would adapt the first part of your suggestion for the following 
> wording, to make it more precise, what 'preserve' means to us.
>
>  "Applications that read and write documents should preserve all 
> metadata files with their named RDF graphs they represent."
>
>  I assume we can drop par regarding the statements, as they are what 
> the graph is made of.

I'd strike "named" since this would relate to unnamed graphs as well.

I'm still not sure the language is exactly right though. It's not 
really wrong technical; just a little awkward.

Patrick, any ideas?

Bruce