Re: [office-requirements] Requirements

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Bob,

Bob Jolliffe wrote:
> Hello
>
> It is the last day of April and it looks like the requirements TC will
> overrun the due date for the report of 1 May.
>
> Nevertheless the number of requests on the public comment list are
> relatively few so I think I can prepare a draft of a report which I
> will share with the SC over the next few days.  There are a number of
> issues which emerge in calls which have been "relegated" to
> requirements.  I have not attended all calls but I am assuming that
> Rob's register of comments accurately captures these.  Rob is this the
> case?
>
> There should also be an opportunity for TC members to make direct
> input, but perhaps this can be after the public contributed
> requirements have been summarized.  Or should such be integrated into
> this document?  I think that would be the start of a longer process.
>
>   
For what its worth, I think that having the summary of requirements 
contributed by the public may trigger other or more detailed 
requirements from TC members. Not that requirements from TC members 
should be excluded from this version but at this point I would be more 
interested in what the "public" would like to see in the next version.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)