[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-requirements] Groups - requirements_draft_03_06_2009.ods uploaded
Hi Bob, Bob Jolliffe wrote: [...] > >> The comment of Rick Jelliffe is the older one and has also the higher >> priority (blocker against major), while RF2000's issue has a concrete >> proposal attached. FMPOV, it would be best practice to keep the older >> issue, adding the link to our proposal. Would you agree? Is there >> anything else to consider? > > I think there are ideally two sources of submitted requirements (Of > course there are also others which were not submitted explicitly as > requirements but which have become designated as such by the TC). The > one is from the general public via a mail to the comment list using > the Requirements template. The other, at least at the moment, is the > list of proposals on the wiki, which are proposals submitted by TC > members also using a template. > > I think the best thing to do would be to create a proposal on the > "list of proposals" page of the wiki which refers to your mail. What > do others think? Am I interpreting this list correctly? The proposal shall of course be added to the wiki. However, the comments I have been getting so far, raised some concerns about the data model and it's effects regarding on accessibility. I wanted to work on this, but couldn't find enough time so far. To move ahead and gain visibility, I will copy the proposal as it is to the wiki and work on it later. > > And yes, we will have to group them and link or remove duplicates. > But for the moment my first challenge is to ensure that we have > captured all of them. I totally agree. Best regards, Peter >> bobj@dst.gov.za wrote: >>> Greetings >>> >>> I have uploaded a calc spreadsheet which is automatically generated via >>> xslt from the issues tagged as a fix for ODF-Next on Jira. Its a first >>> stab and there's some work to be done with it. >>> >>> Unfortunately not all requirements submissions have come through the >>> prescribed process - in an email with fields marked up as +TITLE, +NAME, >>> +SCOPE etc. What I have done in my primitive jira2ods xslt transformation >>> is to follow the URLs listed in the jira issue and parse this information >>> out. Two possible fixes to the process would be: >>> >>> 1. for me to re-post the unformatted public comment (perhaps to the >>> odf-next list) and put in the required fields. Then edit the jira issue so >>> that it points at the new mail message. >>> >>> 2. create the requirements fields as "first class" jira issue attributes >>> for a requirement. I don't know how to do that, but I suspect it is >>> doable. Then manually edit them. >>> >>> The other alternative is to do nothing so fancy and just manually maintain >>> the list. >>> >>> In addition we have a list of 46 TC proposals >>> (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/List_of_Proposals) which are "in >>> progress" but have not been approved. Given that we did a freeze on new >>> proposals for odf 1.2 I am assuming that each of these will also >>> potentially be a requirement for odf-next. >>> >>> Regards >>> Bob >>> >>> -- Mr. Bob Jolliffe >>> >>> The document named requirements_draft_03_06_2009.ods has been submitted by >>> Mr. Bob Jolliffe to the OpenDocument - Requirements document repository. >>> >>> Document Description: >>> ODF-Next requirements >>> >>> View Document Details: >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=32771 >>> >>> Download Document: >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32771/requirements_draft_03_06_2009.ods >>> >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application >>> may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste >>> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. >>> >>> -OASIS Open Administration >> -- >> Peter Junge >> Open Source Strategy Director >> >> Beijing Redflag Chinese 2000 Software Co., Ltd. >> Building No.2, Block A, Huilongsen, 18 Xihuan Nanlu >> Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area >> 100176 Beijing - P.R.China >> >> 北京红旗中文贰仟软件技术有限公司 >> 地址：北京经济技术开发区（亦庄）西环南路18号汇龙森A座二层 >> 邮编：100176 >> >> 电话/Tel: +86-10-51570010 ext.6183 >> 邮箱/e-mail： peterjunge@RedOffice.com >> http://www.RedOffice.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned by DST MailScanner >> >> >> > -- Peter Junge Open Source Strategy Director Beijing Redflag Chinese 2000 Software Co., Ltd. Building No.2, Block A, Huilongsen, 18 Xihuan Nanlu Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area 100176 Beijing - P.R.China 北京红旗中文贰仟软件技术有限公司 地址：北京经济技术开发区（亦庄）西环南路18号汇龙森A座二层 邮编：100176 电话/Tel: +86-10-51570010 ext.6183 邮箱/e-mail： peterjunge@RedOffice.com http://www.RedOffice.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]