[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: 1.2 Namespaces: Open Office Specification Draft
Hi Patrick, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Michael, > > The TODO note lists adding the namespace for "math," but we also import > "dc" (Dublin Core). I've just added dc as a TODO. > > BTW, as a matter of style, shouldn't the namespacess be listed in the > same order as they appear in the schema? I have no preference for which > one conforms to the other but this was raised as an issue on the > documentation I am writing for a schema that the SBL and the ABS > (American Bible Society) developed for Bible translations. A small thing > admittedly but I had to agree that it would improve the readability for > a user who was consulting the schema along with the documentation. You are right. We should reorder the namespaces to reflect the order in which we describe their content. > > Highly likely to be useful for a user who is reading the specification > document, less likely to be useful for other users. Have not checked > elsewhere in the documentation but might be a good practice to follow > for other such presentations. > > Hope you are having a great day! > > Patrick > Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer Phone: +49 40 23646 500 Technical Architect Software Engineering Fax: +49 40 23646 550 StarOffice Applications Star Office Software Entwicklungs GmbH Sachsenfeld 4 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany e-mail: michael.brauer@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]