OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments


Thanks Michael.

content-id is fine.

It looks like all text for a caption is wrapped in a text:sequence. I have only seen the use of draw:text-box in Open Office and Workplace implementations. Is this a spec. change and user agent implementation change or just a user agent implementation change?

Cheers,
Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441
Inactive hide details for Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>


          Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>
          Sent by: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM

          06/22/2006 08:16 AM


To

Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS

cc

"Bruce D'Arcus" <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>, office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org, OpenDocument <office@lists.oasis-open.org>

Subject

Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments

Rich,

what Bruce describes actually is what the TC agreed on Monday and what it
already included in the 1.1 draft I'm currently editing.

Does it work for you?

Michael

Bruce D'Arcus wrote On 06/22/06 14:39,:
> Hi Rich,
>
> On Jun 22, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
>
>> I modified the caption proposal to replace the target id for
>> describedby to be <draw:text-box> vs. <text:p>. The reason is that we
>> discovered later that the caption can have multiple <text:p> per the
>> schema and therefore the encapsulating text box should be the target id.
>
>
> IIRC, Michael Brauer said you could wrap the paragraphs in a
> text:section element as well. Am not sure which is better, but in any
> case, the idea is that same.
>
>> Where is the TC at on the caption proposal. Has it agreed to use
>> describedBy or are they wanting to do something more heavyweight like
>> introducing a caption element?
>
>
> We actually approved the attribute on Monday, although there was
> consensus that caption-id is better because more specific. So 1.1 will
> add a "caption-id" attribute per the original proposal.
>
> I guess this is unofficial until the minutes are posted and approved?
>
> Bruce
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
>
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

--
Michael Brauer                                Phone:  +49 40 23646 500
Technical Architect Software Engineering      Fax:    +49 40 23646 550
StarOffice Development
Sun Microsystems GmbH
Sachsenfeld 4
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany                e-mail: michael.brauer@sun.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 


GIF image



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]