Re: [office] id or xml:id attribute?

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 10/11/06, Bruce D'Arcus <bruce.darcus@opendocument.us> wrote:

>
> I'm just asking how we ought to interpret this; for example, for the
> metadata work.
>
> Using RDF/A with XHTML, for example, if you have:
>
>         <x:p id="1">foo</x:p>
>
> ... you may refer to that paragraph by pre-pending a fragment hash. So
> if you're within the same document "#1" and if you're pointing from
> outside "http://ex.net/bar#1";.
>
> So how are we to interpret the ODF id attributes (plural) then?


And how should we interpret this in respect of
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/
from which "A uniform mechanism for recognizing identifiers is desirable." :-)
and
"Authors of XML documents are encouraged to name their ID attributes
"xml:id" to increase the interoperability of these identifiers on the
Web."

I think 1.2 would be a good chance to decide if we mean xml:id
or just another attribute.

I don't think this would meet your example Bruce?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk