Re: [office] Numbering spec

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Hi David,

can you post a sample? I seem to a "mind blockage". At best using the numbered-paragraph and the text:list,
text:list-item encoding. 

Thanks very much,

~Florian

>>> David Faure <faure@kde.org> 11/22/06 12:42 PM >>>
On Wed Nov 22 2006, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I don't see how moving the attribute from text:list-item to text:list changes anything?

Well, then the addition of the list-id attribute doesn't "break the concept that every <text:list> element declares the
domain of one list", which was your objection against it.

> Additionally I don't yet understand what kind of list description you need which can't be encoded using the
style-override approach?

None. I just find that list-id + list-name is much cleaner and more intuitive (everyone will get it right: the id for
identifying the list, the style-name to find the style)
whereas style-override sounds like something that many implementors will just overlook and they'll use style-name to
find the style; style-override looks like
a hack, especially if the goal is indeed simply listid-style separation.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).