[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Passwords
David, David Faure wrote: >On Tue Nov 28 2006, Patrick Durusau wrote: > > >>Shouldn't encryption of the password be considered as application specific? >> >> > >This would simply kill interoperability. Why don't we standardize the hash function instead? > > > Sure, but we did not even specify a choice of hash functions in the current version. So, specifying what must/should be supported will enhance interoperability but would be more restrictive than our prior statements on this issue. Does anyone know if the list of hash functions posted by Florian (thanks!) would be considered sufficient by government agencies? Or common? Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau Patrick@Durusau.net Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]