Re: [office] ISO/IEC 26300

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

Good news, and thanks to Patrick, Michael
and Jamie for all of your hard work during this process.

Is there anything additional we can
do to make this specification cost free in ISO?  I've seen this done
with other standards out of JTC1.  Do you know how this is triggered?
 

-Rob 

Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> wrote
on 12/01/2006 08:17:11 AM:

> Michael,
> 
> Well, a bit early but should put a smile on everyone's face for the
> upcoming holiday season!
> 
> Congratulations!
> 
> Hope you are having a great day! (You have certainly made mine a great
one!)
> 
> Patrick
> 
> Michael Brauer wrote:
> 
> > All:
> >
> > the status of ISO/IEC 26300 is now 60.60.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > James Bryce Clark wrote:
> >
> >>   As you may know, ISO has changed the visible status
of OpenDocument 
> >> v1 as approved (ISO/IEC 26300) to correctly reflect its International
> >> Status standard, "60.00" in its harmonized stage
coding.  This can be 
> >> seen by searching for "26300" in the ISO search
function, after 
> >> selecting "Search options > ISO number" and
"Items to show > Both", 
> >> at 
> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage.CatalogueList?&scopelist=ALL.
> >>
> >>
> >>   Another way into this data is the following compound
search results 
> >> URI:
> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/catsupport/StandardsQueryFormHandler.
> StandardsQueryFormHandler?
> scope=ALL&keyword=&isoNumber=26300&sortOrder=ISO&title=true&search_type=ISO&search_term=26300
> >>
> >>
> >>   A table of the stage codes appears here:
> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/widepages/stagetable.html
> >>
> >>   When the IS is released for official publication in
a few weeks, 
> >> that status code will be upgraded to "60.60" to
reflect the 
> >> availability of copies for sale at the ISO web store.
> >>
> >>    Likely our next topic, regarding ISO/IEC JTC1,
will be what to 
> >> advise them regarding v1.1 (which you've completed and are
balloting 
> >> now, congratulations) and v1.x/2.0.  We've indicated
that we plan to 
> >> bring back appropriately stable revisions to JTC1.  So
the question 
> >> will be which next version is "appropriately stable."
 Based on 
> >> preliminary chats with several of you, it's my understanding
is that 
> >> v1.1 is unlikely to be suggested for resubmission.
> >>
> >>     Kind regards JBC
> >>
> >> ~ James Bryce Clark
> >> ~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
> >> ~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Durusau
> Patrick@Durusau.net
> Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
> Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
> 
> Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work! 
> 
>