[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Critical problem
Thats great. Looking forward to see it. It currently stops me from getting to the next level of understanding. ~Florian >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 03/13/07 1:47 PM >>> Hi Florian, Sorry, that I didn't answer to your request in the next second after you have put it to the mailing list. Currently, I'm busy this some other stuff. Be patient, I will provide you the XML fragment. Regards, Oliver. Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > could you please send me the XML fragment. That's all I need. So again. How will > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:p>Text</text:p> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:p>Text</text:p> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP3</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP4</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:p>Text</text:p> > <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L2"><text:p>Appendix</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph> > <text:p>Text</text:p> > > be represented in text:list. According to your personal understandin of the proposal? > > Thats all I need. > > Sometimes a "picture" speaks more than thousand words to me. > > ~Florian > > >>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/13/07 1:29 PM >>> > On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:15, Florian Reuter wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I really need to see an XML fragment using text:list which encodes what the >> numbered-paragraph (list-id) fragment. Or a statement that it isn't >> possible. > > Of course its possible. > Have you actually read the proposal? > Which part of "Which makes it possible" in the email you replied to, is not > clear? > > Stop making assumptions about things you think are being said, but are not > actually said and read a LOT more carefully the emails we write before making > assumptions and putting words in peoples mouths on a public list, pretty > please. > > ps. no I'm not angry; I just want to be clear without pretty words obscuring > the point.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]