Re: [office] Critical problem

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Thomas,

why do you refuse the provide the sample. It is a weak spot? :-)

If the proposal/ideas are so crystal clear why not provide a dump mind like me with an XML fragment?


~Florian

>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/13/07 1:49 PM >>>
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:25, Florian Reuter wrote:
> I'm assuming a "1:1 relationship between the list style and the counter
> domain".
>
> However Michael and Oliver clearly states that this is not the case.

Switching from the idea that there is a 1:1 relation to the idea that there is 
no direct relation between content and markup can be boiled down to the 
default value of
 <text:list continue-numbering
At least for text:list style numbering.

I feel a little like the teacher and you are the stubborn pupil that wants to 
proof his point by avoiding answering the simple question;  What do you think 
it would look like given the theory (i.e. proposal) supplied?

The reason the teacher is always so annoying is because he asks you to think 
about it and come to your own conclusions. Since I can't just feed you facts 
and expect you to understand the concepts afterwards.

Sorry for being the annoying teacher, but I really do think you should try 
harder to read the proposal to add style-override and list-id and figure out 
what the text:list would look like for the example you started this thread 
with.
In my mind, its clear that that is the only way you are ever going to get a 
good grasp of the subject matter.
-- 
Thomas Zander