[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] change to the existing proposal [was: Re: [office]Critical problem]
Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi, > > thanks Oliver. I will now take some time to understand your new proposal. > > Just two guesses: > * by introducing a text:list-id on text:list there is no need for list-override any longer. Thus your proposal doesn't > reflect a "compromise" any more. > * by introducing a text:list-id on text:list you made a change which harms backward compatibility. > > Just my two cents for now. Please tell me if thats wrong. However I will try to justify these statements myself. > > I'll follow up on this when I'm confident I understood the new proposal. > First, I didn't propose to introduce text:list-id to <text:list>. I propose to introduce text:id to <text:list> as an identify for the list. I'm still confident, that it's sensible to introduce attribute text:style-override to <text:list-item>. Think of the use case, that you want to apply a different list style to a list item on the second list level. E.g.: 1. P1 1.1 P2 1.2 P3 1.C P4 1.4 P5 For this list you will get the following <text:list> structure: <text:list style-name="L1" > <text:list-item><text:p>P1</text:p></text:list-item> <text:list> <text:list-item><text:p>P2</text:p></text:list-item> <text:list-item><text:p>P3</text:p></text:list-item> <text:list-item text:style-override="L2"> <text:p>P4</text:p> </text:list-item> <text:list-item><text:p>P5</text:p></text:list-item> </text:list> </text:list> By introducing text:id and text:continue-numbering to <text:list> a new feature is introduced to ODF - namely the feature to identify and continue a certain list. In my view, this harms backward compatibility as any other new feature harms the backward compatibility. Regards, Oliver.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]