Re: [office] revised proposal: new attributes text:style-override andtext:list-id

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems<Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM>]

Hi Thomas,

Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 10:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmannwrote:
>> Proposal:
>> (1) Introduce new mandatory attribute text:list-id for
>> <text:numbered-paragraph>. The purpose of this attribute is to group
>> certain instances of <text:numbered-paragraph> together to one list.
>> Thus, all numbered paragraphs with the same list-id form a list and
>> each list-id defines one counter domain.
>> For the start values of the counter domain defined by a list-id it's
>> proposed to use the start values of the list style of the first
>> numbered paragraph of the list.
> 
> []
>> (4) Each top-most list block denotes a certain list and defines the
>> counter domain for its including list items and sub lists. The list
>> style, which will be applied to this list, can define start values for
>> each list level. A specified list style on a certain sub list
>> overrides a possible given start value for its list level, if it
>> contains the list definition for this list level. Each sub list
>> restarts the counter for its list level.
> 
> I'm going to be very annoying now :)
> The above two sections are for numbered-paragraphs and text:lists 
> respectively. And they are suppost to say the same.
> But they don't due to a slight wording issue in section one.
> The effect is that for numbered paragraphs the style used for the first 
> paragraph suggests the start of numbering for all levels over the whole list.
> The text:list one instead uses the start from the overridden style on a 
> sublist instead of the top-level list.
> 
> Lets both do the same; and as we agreed upon the latter behavior some weeks 
> ago. The textual change (in point 1) is;
> 
>   For the start values of the counter domain defined by a list-id it's
>   proposed to use the start values of the list style of the first
> - numbered paragraph of the list.
> + numbered paragraph at every list level.
> 
> Oliver, you concur?

I strongly agree to your proposed change.
It was an oversight from my side - sorry for that.

Regards, Oliver.