Re: [office] comparingrequirements againstThomas'/David's/Oliver'sproposal

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Hi David,

sorry. I guess I misunderstood you.

Wrt. to the post-increment algorithm problem. This comes only into play when dealing with list-override.

~Florian

>>> David Faure <faure@kde.org> 03/29/07 3:40 PM >>>
On Thursday 29 March 2007, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> > counter styles worked like I expected
> 
> Do you claim that WW lists work like numbered-paragraphs according to the Sun/KOffice proposal?
No, I never made such a general claim, my statement is being taken out of context :)

I merely stated that I saw no evidence of a "post increment" algorithm in my tests
[which were long ago, and with binary .doc files, not with docx files]

> In fact my finding is different. I have attached two sample OOXML docs to illustrate my findings. 
Sorry, no msword at hand to test .docx files.

> In my opinion these 
> samples clearly show that 
> * WW does not behave like the Sun/KOffice proposal
> * WW's list-override is not compatible with the Sun/KOffice proposal

I can neither confirm nor deny this, I have no idea about such a general statement.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).