Re: [office] Concerning backwards compatibility in odf 1.2

[Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>]

On Thursday 29 March 2007 22:52, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
>  ODF 1.2 is feeling to be
> like a major version update.  I sometimes wonder if it should be called
> ODF 2.0.

The negative result of such a rename would be that people expect a major 
version to break backwards compatibility; so I don't think its a good idea.

If in the future we have various minor fixes and changes we can release an 
1.2.1 release to make clear that that is a minor update.
-- 
Thomas Zander

PGP signature