[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: language
Hmm, this is a little tricky; going to cc this to the list in case anyone else has thoughts ... On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: > Which version do prefer, the third is currently in the spec: > > "The odf:Package resource description in the metadata manifest > represents the OpenDocument package itself." > or > "The odf:Package node in the metadata manifest represents the > OpenDocument package itself." > or > "The odf:Package in the metadata manifest represents the OpenDocument > package itself." The problem is that you are assuming a particular syntax; <odf:Package> ... </odf:Package> ... rather than: <rdf:Description> <rdf:type rdf:resource="[uri]"/> </rdf:Description> To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense. To be more precise, maybe something like: "The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself." Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]