[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Excel 2007 != Ecma spec YEARFRAC. Not even slightly.What should we do?
Warren Turkal: > I don't think that we should standardize the excel algorithms What if > we just have a registry of compatibility bases that is maintained > separately from the ODF spec? We could just reserve 5000 basis numbers > that represent a compatibility bases and a 200 or so for a private > area that will never be allocated in the registry for experimentation. The idea of having a separate "basis registry" has merit. At the least, it means we could complete the OpenFormula spec, and point out to a separate registry for that part of it. I think it _would_ be wise to spec the Excel algorithms, because there are people who count on them; but if they're in a separate registry, that makes things easier. It doesn't address the problem that different people may want basis==0 to mean different things. The only solution I see for that is to attach some parameter to the sheet (as I noted earlier), which can affect the mapping of the basis value to the algorithm used. --- David A. Wheeler
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]