Re: [office] Groups - Proposals for angle attribute values (08-03-14-angle-attribute-values.odt) (formerly 08-03-14-proposal00069) modified

["Warren Turkal" <turkal@google.com>]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02
- Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote:
> Warren Turkal wrote:
>
> > Also, I would say that the data type should be improved more specific
> > than "string" in the schema at the bottom.
> >
>
>  In general I agree, but the problem that we face is that the only way to do
> so would be define an regular expression that restricts the string values.
> This regular expression would be rather complex and hard to read. We further
> face the problem that we would duplicate a definition that is actually part
> of the SVG specification, from which we take that datatype. SVG actually
> defines it also as string.

Should we just refer to the SVG spec instead of duplicating it.

wt