#1 Proposed Resolution of Errata Comment

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Re: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00012.html


In my first-identified comment on the ODF 1.0 Errata public review, there
are two points.  I propose that these are easily resolved:

Point 1 - The errata document has office:version="1.2"

Resolution: Make sure that the errata document has office:version="1.1" if
there is a version attribute at all.

Point 2 - Choice of the base document

Resolution: Comment is resolved in the current text.  No action required.

Background: I noticed that the errata were targeted to the original OASIS
Standard for ODF 1.0 PDF and not IS 26300.  That was a mistake.  On looking
more closely, it is clear that the Errata are provided for both of the
current ODF 1.0 Standards, IS 26300 (via the ed2cs1 text) as a courtesy, and
the OASIS Standard of May 2005, where the errata are to be "official."
 

 - Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:24
To: Dennis E. Hamilton; Sheldon Britton; Dave Pawson;
eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp
Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org; office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary
McRae
Subject: [office] ODF 1.0 Approved Errata 01 -- Public review comments

[ ... ]

The following comments were received during the ODF 1.0 Approved Errata 01 
document public review period:

[#1] Dennis E. Hamilton:  
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00012.html