[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3 - Stage 1 Review
Hi Patrick, I am reviewing the new errata draft in stages: 0. Explain my understanding of our line-numbering disagreement for 9.3.3 (done) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00044.html 1. Review the line numbers in draft 3, verifying the changes previously noticed and also verifying the new errata items introduced in draft 3. 2. Review the new links and applicability to the identified items in the new column, referring to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 34 document N0942, Defect Report on ISO/IEC 26300:2006, 2007-12-08, available at http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0942rev1.htm The discrepancies noted below are the result of (1), reviewing the section and line numbers and the related instructions. - Dennis PS: Two of the notes are amusing to me because at one time I programmed a Univac computer, although I never programmed a Unisys computer. But I had to learn that it was a Univac computer because I worked for Remington Rand Univac, and then Sperry Univac, and it mattered to them. It apparently matters to the IETF as well. SECTION AND LINE NUMBER DISCREPANCIES IN ERRATA DRAFT 3 ODF 1.0 IS 26300 Section page line page line 9.3.11 311 24 315 15 [new insertion] The effect of the instruction is to change "a URI" to "an URI" in ODF 1.0 and "a IRI" to "an IRI" in IS 26300. Unfortunately, "URI" is a plural term in accordance with [RFC2396] and, if used in singular, it would be "a URI" just as it is "a URL." That's because it is either you-are-eye or Universal Resource Mumble, and either way we have the 'except when pronounced as "Y"' exception to U being a vowel, even though in speech we might say "an earl." 15.4.7 *555**41* 565 *9* [proposed correction] 556 8 565 12 [line in errata 3] Problem: 556-8 is in section 15.4.8, not 15.4.7. In the proposed correction, the line numbers are those on which the text to be deleted begins. 15.27.31 655 12 *667* 10 [missed correction. It is made on the next 15.27.31 item] 15.28.4 656 *32* 668 31 [656 has one more line at the top than 668] *15.31.3* 663 21 675 37 [typos "15.13.3" but *15.31.3* 663 34 676 5 in correct place] [I can't believe the number of times I looked at this page and didn't see that.] 17.5 686 18 699 17 I just noticed that the new text has the phrase "a schema (like http:)". The correct term is "scheme" or even "URL scheme" in accordance with [RFC2396] and the scheme name does not include the ":", so "a URL scheme (as in http:)" might be more precise. (And it is "a URL" not "an URL", also in accord with [RFC2396].) 17.6 686 38 699 36 [deleted by mistake?] The correction instruction is: Replace "thumbnails" with "Thumbnails". [This is needed to complete the corrections given for the preceding line of 17.6. This could also be incorporated in that change.] -----Original Message----- From: patrick@durusau.net [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00040.html Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 04:04 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Groups - ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3 (ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3.odt) uploaded [ ... ] The document named ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3 (ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3.odt) has been submitted by Patrick Durusau* to the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC document repository. Document Description: Draft errata for ODF 1.0 View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/document.php?document_id=29336 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/download.php/29336/ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3.odt [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]