[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] preferred view mode upon opening document
That's a good idea. wt On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:47, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote: > This sounds good to me. I only would like to add that whenever an > implementor adds an implementation specific value and believes that other > implementations could make reasonable use of it, that I then would strongly > recommend to submit a proposal to the TC to standardize this value. > > Michael > > On 29.10.08 22:09, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: >> >> > 2. What about a sentence on the specification like: "It is >>> >>> recommended that all custom view mode specification documentation is >>> made available to enhance documents interoperability" ? >>> >> >> The issue Warren raises is a general issue, not exclusive to view mode >> alone. One way to address this globally is two add two things to the ODF >> text: >> >> 1) Where ever something like this occurs, explicitly call the behavior >> "implementation-defined". Use that as a uniform label of areas where ODF >> allows implementations to implement their own behaviors. So we say >> something like "Additional view modes may be used, but they shall be >> prefixed by a namespace qualifier not defined by this standard. The >> behavior of such view modes is implementation-defined". >> >> 2) Then in the conformance clause, we add language like: "An >> implementation shall be accompanied by a document that defines all >> implementation-defined and locale-specific characteristics and all >> extensions." (That is the language directly out of ISO/IEC 9899:1999 C >> Programming Language. You can see here what one implementation created to >> define its "implementation-defined" features: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Implementation.html >> >> We don't need that exact language, but you get the idea. A standard can >> allow implementation-defined behavior, but can also require that these be >> documented. If we're going to do this, I'd rather we do it pervasively in >> the standard rather than just in the view mode attribute. >> >> What do TC members think? >> Regards, >> >> -Rob >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > -- > Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering > StarOffice/OpenOffice.org > Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 > D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com > http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 > http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, > D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten > Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]