Re: [office] Required items for a public review

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Dennis,

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> And that it please the reviewer and commenter deities, let us line number
> the documents this time and provide cross-referencing section numbers as
> deep as there are heading lines, even if the TOC doesn't go that low?  
>
>   
I think the cross-referencing is already as deep as you request.

On line numbering, allowing for operator error, ;-), I am not sure it 
will work for tables. I tested with both OOo 2.4 and 3.0 and automatic 
numbering did not number lines in a table.

Would you want the line numbering to start over at the beginning of 
every page? (That would be my preference but I realize opinions may vary 
on that score.)

I assume from your comments you mean that we should number every line 
(as opposed to every fifth line)?

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick
>  - Dennis 
>
> PS: I just saw a nice document where every fifth line was numbered.  I think
> we should number them all automatically.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 02:46
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [office] Required items for a public review
>
> Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM wrote on 11/14/2008 09:58:57 AM:
>   
>> Der TC members,
>>
>> below is a list of items that in my opinion have to be addressed before
>> we can submit ODF 1.2 for a public review
>>
>>     
>
> A) Public review is one step along the path to approval as an OASIS 
> Standard.  For the benefit of TC members who have not been through this 
> process before, the important steps are:
>
> 1) Approval of a Committee Draft.  This can be done at any time, by Full 
> Majority Vote of the TC.  There are no other requirements.  The TC can 
> issue as many numbered Committee Drafts as it wishes.  I'd like the TC to 
> make more use of this level of approval, considering that we have some 
> stakeholders/partners, such as the accessibility SC, or JTC1/SC34 members, 
> who may want more time to review and discuss an ODF 1.2 draft than 
> provided for in a 2-month public review.
>
> So I'd recommend that we approve a Committee Draft and notify the 
> Accessibility SC and JTC1/SC34 of it as soon as the following minimal 
> requirements are met:
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>   

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)