[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: DSigProposal references
Bob, Bob Jolliffe wrote: > Hi Patrick > > Jomar and I both think the note form works well. It better captures > the fact that we > are not proposing doing anything which is outside xml dsig. I will change it. > > Glad to be of service! Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > Regards > Bob > > 2009/1/6 Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>: > >> Bob, >> >> Bob Jolliffe wrote: >> >>> Hello Patrick >>> >>> Further to this afternoon's discussion I have added references to the >>> ETSI XAdES standard and the W3C XML-DSIG (courtesy of Dennis). You >>> can check what I have here: >>> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/DSigProposal. >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks! >> >>> I'm also not sure about the URI to one-hop-from-what-you-really-want. >>> I've fudged by saying "available via http://.."; instead of "available >>> at". Feels a bit like cheating, but this is the reference the ETSI TC >>> gave us. It looks like you can bypass the whole rigmarole and go >>> straight to http://pda.etsi.org/exchangefolder/ts_101903v010302p.pdf >>> but perhaps they want readers to read the copyright notice and the >>> blurb first. >>> >>> >>> >> Yes, the direct access works but I don't have a serious problem with getting >> users to read their blurb. ;-) >> >> To some degree it is a question of changing practice. To give a URL really >> is a convenience to the reader, it doesn't really constitute a reference to >> the work. That is the digital signature standard would exist whether I can >> access it via http or if I have to request a paper copy. Which would be >> ironic but not unknown. ;-) >> >> BTW, with your current text: >> >> >>> "Files within a package may have digital signatures applied. These digital >>> signatures *shall* conform to the W3C XML Digital Signature specification >>> [xml-dsig]. Applications *may* use extensions to the XML DSIG core >>> specification, such as those required for implementation of XAdES signatures >>> specified in ETSI TS 101 903 v1.3.2 [xades]. Digital signatures are stored >>> in one or more files within the META-INF folder." >>> >> My suggestion was: >> >> "Files within a package may have digital signatures applied. These digital >> signatures *shall* conform to the W3C XML Digital Signature specification >> [xml-dsig]. >> >> Note: Applications may use extensions to the XML DSIG core specification, >> such as those required for implementation of XAdES signatures specified in >> ETSI TS 101 903 v1.3.2 [xades]. ** >> >> Digital signatures are stored in one or more files within the META-INF >> folder." >> >> Reasoning that the permissive "may" is actually defined by the W3C >> specification and not ODF. >> >> It is a minor point and if you prefer the full paragraph style I have no >> serious issue with it. It may be more acceptable to the interests who want >> this feature to be stated that way. >> >> Hope you are having a great day! >> >> Patrick >> >> >> -- >> Patrick Durusau >> patrick@durusau.net >> Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 >> Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) >> Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 >> Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]