[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] (OASIS Issue Tracker) Commented: (OFFICE-1700) Editor Note: Section 18.258 style:font-charset
2009/6/16 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>: > Remember, before JIRA we did not discuss and vote on every change to the > standard invidually. Why should it be different now that we have JIRA? > JIRA helps us track the comments better. But it doesn't change the TC's > draft approval process. > I wouldn't read too much into JIRA's terms "resolved" and "applied". > Certainly "applied" means only that the draft has been amended to resolve > the issue according to the stated resolution. It does not mean that the > change was approved by the TC. > > Since most issues are not controversial, this is fine in most case. so Oasis has zero traceability from issue through to resolution on ODF. That seems to be the case? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]