OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [office] Comments on draft response

I am confused about what it is we are doing here.  I apologize for not
taking my first look until this morning.

Elsewhere, we have been referring to the creation of an ODF 1.0 Errata 02.  

This document is not an Errata document.  It is a specific response to SC34
and N1078.

So I don't understand how this relates to having achieved the start of a
public comment period, etc., etc. 

I had (foolishly?) expected that we were building a supplemental document in
the fashion of ODF 1.0 Errata 01.

I am willing to review this for what it is.  I don't regard it as a
substitute for an errata document.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 04:59
To: ODF office
Subject: [office] Comments on draft response


Just quickly before I hop into a cab.

Andreas has suggested that the responses to JP2-18, JP2-23, JP2-25, 
JP2-27, JP2-29 are insufficient.

In the alternative he has suggested that we simply say these 
capabilities are application defined (for cases where we don't 
sufficiently define something for it to be implemented). To be corrected 
in 1.2 of course.

BTW, note the typo in JP2-34. The reference should be to JP2-35.

Hope everyone is at the start of a great week!


Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]