Re: [office] ODF 1.2 review part staging

[Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

I also favor approach B)

Best regards

Michael



Am 01.10.09 20:00, Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
> I favor this approach.  
> 
> I am ramping up my review of Part III along with Michael to see how close we
> can get to a CD and then work toward public review and maybe even committee
> spec.  I am sure that a CS will attract further comment while we are waiting
> for the broader concurrent review down the road, and that will be goodness
> too.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200910/msg00003.html
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 09:01
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [office] ODF 1.2 review part staging
> 
> On Monday's TC call I mentioned that I was focusing over the next couple 
> of weeks on JIRA defects related to ODF 1.2 Part I and III,   Obviously, 
> this would mean less emphasis on Part II (OpenFormula) in this time frame. 
>  
> [ ... ]
> 
> B) Send the individual parts of ODF 1.2 out for public review when each 
> part is ready.  Since the parts vary in length and degree of maturity, I 
> think that they may be made available for public review in a staggered 
> fashion over the next few months.  Part III Packing is the closest to 
> being ready for public review, followed by Part I and then Part II.  As 
> one part is out for public review, the TC can finish the editing of the 
> parts that are not yet ready.  The net is that we're fully utilizing both 
> the capacity of those who participate in the public review, as well as the 
> TC's capacity to fix defects.  No one sits around waiting.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> As for defect processing in JIRA, my recommendation would be to push 
> forward the "most mature" parts first, to get them ready for public 
> review.  So in my case, I have defects assigned to me in Parts I and II. 
> Since Part I is closer to being ready for public review, I'm going to work 
> on those now.  This doesn't mean that OpenFormula is less important.  This 
> is just a way to stage the parts to maximize the utilization of available 
> resources given the constraints of the review process.
> 
> Please let me know if anyone has concerns with this.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
	   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering