[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion
Dear TC members, last week I had made a motion for approving ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD03 Rev 07 as Committee Draft, and to send it out for a 60-day public review. This motion has been seconded. Dennis made a motion to split the ballot into one for the Committee Draft approval, and one for the public review. This motion has not been seconded. Dennis further made a motion to extend the public review period to 90 days. This motion has been seconded. This means that we not only have to vote regarding a CD and a public review, but also about the duration of the public review (60 or 90 days). To consider that motion on the hand, and to provide the TC with the flexibility to possibly revise the draft after 60 days review or to conduct a combined review of all three parts after 60 days on the other hand, Rob has made the following proposal: We start with a 60 day public review, but possibly vote for extending the review by 30 days towards the end of the review. He has further confirmed with the OASIS TC administration that this is possible. Essentially, this means that the requested ballot regarding extending the public review to 90 days would be deferred towards the end the public review if it is not withdrawn or replaced by other motions. If we include the option to run a ballot regarding extending the public review any time between now and the end of the public review, we actually consider both motions that have been seconded, but also Rob's proposal. I therefore intent to setup the following ballot: ===== Shall the OASIS ODF TC approve ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD03 Rev 07 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200912/msg00002.html and the corresponding schema files http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200910/msg00455.html as a Committee Draft, and shall that Committee Draft be send out for a 60-day Public Review, with the option to extend the public review by 30 days, if a motion for this is made and approved before or during the public review. Shall further the external stakeholders listed below being notified regarding the public review? - OASIS ODF Interoperability and Conformance TC, - OASIS ODF Adoption TC, - JTC1/SC34. Shall further from the three versions of the specification document (ODF, PDF and HTML) that will be produced after approval as committee draft the ODF version be the authoritative one? ===== I intent to set up an additional ballot for extending the review by 30 days in parallel if that is requested by those TC members who made the motion to extend the public review to 90 days, or seconded that. Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]