Re: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion

[Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

Hi Thorsten,

On 06/04/10 23:14, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I asked:
>>> Shall further from the three versions of the specification document
>>> (ODF, PDF and HTML) that will be produced after approval as committee
>>> draft the ODF version be the authoritative one?
>> I think a clarification is missing here - which ODF version will we
>> use to publish this authoritative document in?
>>
> Hi Michael,
> 
> so looking into OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05.zip it seems the answer is
> "1.2" - isn't that a bit self-referential? 

It is comment practice. If you look at the various HTML specification, 
then the HTML 3.2 specification is an HTML 3.2 document, the HTML 4.01 
specification is an HTML 4 document, and so on.

Best regards

Michael
> 
> (and sorry for getting back to this so late in the game)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- Thorsten
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
	   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz