[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion
Hi Thorsten, On 06/04/10 23:14, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > I asked: >>> Shall further from the three versions of the specification document >>> (ODF, PDF and HTML) that will be produced after approval as committee >>> draft the ODF version be the authoritative one? >> I think a clarification is missing here - which ODF version will we >> use to publish this authoritative document in? >> > Hi Michael, > > so looking into OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05.zip it seems the answer is > "1.2" - isn't that a bit self-referential? It is comment practice. If you look at the various HTML specification, then the HTML 3.2 specification is an HTML 3.2 document, the HTML 4.01 specification is an HTML 4 document, and so on. Best regards Michael > > (and sorry for getting back to this so late in the game) > > Cheers, > > -- Thorsten > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]