OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion

On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 11:16 -0600, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:

> The TC is required to provide the CDs in editable source, PDF and X/HTML. 
> The format of the editable source is a factual question.  If it was indeed 
> authored in draft ODF 1.2 as written by OOo 3.2.x, then we are obliged to 
> deliver the document in that format.  If it was written in Word DOC format 
> or WordPerfect format, then we would deliver it in that.  There is no 
> requirement that the editable format be a standard. 

OOo 3.2.x does not write ODF1.2 It claims it does but it is clear that
that is not correct:
DF1.2 is not yet approved so how can it know what ODF1.2 really is

Since the document isn't finally "authored" until it is approved, this
discussion really relates to in which format should it be finally


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]