[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] REQUEST on Adjustments and Reballoting for ODF 1.2 PublicReview
On 06/09/10 17:55, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > 1. I assume that the new ballot will be conducted electronically, given a > motion and a second after the modified documents are available. That way we > are not hindered by the absence of a meeting on Monday, June 14. Sorry for the late reply. I was out of the office the last three days. > > 2. Can we please identify the materials for the ballot as CD05-revo1 so > that what we approve becomes CD06 as approved for submission to Public > Review? I know that this will be minor for Parts 1-3, but for the > main/master or whatever it is, there will be body as well as front-matter > changes. (I am attempting to avoid confusion over what particular documents > are and having two documents with the same identification.) I don't think we can call the new draft cd05-rev01. Since the ballot was invalid, we have not approved a CD05. Therefore, we can't call the new drafts CD05. > > 3. WHAT DO WE CALL THE FRONT PIECE? It is easy to talk about and refer to > sections in Parts 1-3. How do we and others refer to the single document > formerly known as Part 0? It is confusing to call it simply ODF 1.2 CD0x > since that is also the name for the composite set. Formally, the document is "the standard". Informally, I'm calling this the overview document. Michael > Although it doesn't quite serve the function, I would not object to it > being "Overview" or something (especially if none of Parts 1-3 have such a > section - I haven't checked). I don't know what should be the title of that > portion, but we need and others need some unambiguous way when we need to > discuss something in that portion of the specification. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 16:34 > To: OpenDocument Mailing List > Cc: Kim Goolsby (E-mail) > Subject: Fwd: [office] Public Review Request for ODF 1.2 CD 05 > > > In the main specification: > 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It > should be: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen > t-v1.1.html > > 2. Section 1 must include terminology and at a minimum a normative reference > to either RFC 2119 or the related ISO reference. > > > In Part 1: > 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It > should be: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen > t-v1.1.html > 2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be > activated. > > > In Part 2: > 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It > should be: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen > t-v1.1.html > 2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be > activated. > > > In Part 3: > 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It > should be: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen > t-v1.1.html > 2. Activate trademark link at bottom of Notices > 3. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be > activated. > 4. Appendix A is empty? > > > Also, it should be noted that the ballot to approve as CD and submit for > public review is invalid and will need to be conducted again (or approved by > a full majority vote in a TC meeting). The OASIS TC Process requires that > all TC ballots be set to include votes of 'yes', 'no', and 'abstain'; this > ballot was set to yes / no only. > > > As soon as we updated copies and a new minutes or ballot reference, we'll > proceed with the review. > > Regards, > > Mary > > > Mary P McRae > Director, Standards Development > Technical Committee Administrator > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > web: www.oasis-open.org > twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen > phone: 1.603.232.9090 > > Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]