[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Errata ballot or new revision?
There is a misunderstanding. In the review if IS 26300:2006/COR1, one of the items was questioned because it did not do anything. It can't be repaired in COR1 because the error is in Errata 01 itself (it is not just not a typography problem between Errata 01 and COR1, it is a production error in the original Errata 01 that was not caught). In order to correct that DEFECT in Errata 01, we must repair it in Errata 02 (in Part 2 not Part 1), because we can't touch Errata 01. This means the particular change will not be in COR1 but it will be in Errata 02 and it may or may not be involved in the reconciliation of comments on the FPDAM for alignment with ODF 1.1. I don't have the actual defect item in front of me, but the statement that ISO will not see Errata 01 is a mistake. They are seeing it now, without the buggy erratum (I presume). The only way to get that change into IS 26300 now is via Part 2 of Errata 02 (directly or indirectly, depending on how the process goes). -----Original Message----- From: Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM [mailto:Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 03:37 To: ODF TC List Cc: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; robert_weir@us.ibm.com; Patrick Durusau Subject: Re: [office] Errata ballot or new revision? [ ... ] ISO will never touch the Errata 01. The previous part will be stripped off before usage, only OASIS got one combining errata document. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]