[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Errata ballot or new revision?
Am 28.06.2010 03:14, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > I see that there has been no new action on this. > I have just uploaded a new revision of the errata document including changes initiated from comments of some members of the SC34. See http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2733 http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2734 > I have today cleared my desk to put more attention on the Errata cd04-rev03 > draft as well as catch up on WG6 action items in this coming week. > > I am starting to look into the Errata draft now but I doubt that I will be > complete before the ODF TC all tomorrow morning, June 28. > > Certainly, if a new ballot is started I will have my comments before the > ballot-due-date. I have no recommendation on which is a better way to > undertake this. Your review is most welcome, looking forward to your feedback. > - Dennis > > PS: One thing, before I forget one more time. Those items in Errata 01 that > are defective (i.e., the one where font changes weren't shown) should be > corrected in Errata 02. I'm assuming that Patrick can't handle those in IS > 26300:2006/COR1. > ISO will never touch the Errata 01. The previous part will be stripped off before usage, only OASIS got one combining errata document. Going to have a chat with Patrick about it, he edited part 1 once, perhaps he might fix the formatting himself, when he applies the errata. Otherwise it seems a double work finding the spots. > PPS: Also, according to WG6 minutes I've seen, there is an understanding > that I don't recall but that is to the effect that those IS 26300 defect > reports we resolve by specifying "implementation dependence" are expected to > be repaired in ODF 1.2 (not sure what that means). > In any case, we might want to spawn some ODF 1.2 sub-issues that track the > ODF 1.0 and 1.1 handled ones to ensure that there is no regression in 1.2. > Regarding the "implementation dependence", I would like to know how the TC wants me as an editor to handle http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2735 http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2736 > -----Original Message----- > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 16:25 > To: Svante Schubert > Cc: email@example.com > Subject: [office] Errata ballot or new revision? > > Hi Svante, > > Before I start a new Errata ballot, did you want to submit a new revision? > I know there was some further discussion in WG6. If we can include that > feedback now, before the ballot starts, it will be better, I think. > > -Rob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >