OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office] Errata ballot or new revision?

Am 28.06.2010 03:14, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> I see that there has been no new action on this.
I have just uploaded a new revision of the errata document including
changes initiated from comments of some members of the SC34.

> I have today cleared my desk to put more attention on the Errata cd04-rev03
> draft as well as catch up on WG6 action items in this coming week.
> I am starting to look into the Errata draft now but I doubt that I will be
> complete before the ODF TC all tomorrow morning, June 28.
> Certainly, if a new ballot is started I will have my comments before the
> ballot-due-date.  I have no recommendation on which is a better way to
> undertake this.  
Your review is most welcome, looking forward to your feedback.
>  - Dennis
> PS: One thing, before I forget one more time.  Those items in Errata 01 that
> are defective (i.e., the one where font changes weren't shown) should be
> corrected in Errata 02.  I'm assuming that Patrick can't handle those in IS
> 26300:2006/COR1.  
ISO will never touch the Errata 01. The previous part will be stripped
off before usage, only OASIS got one combining errata document.
Going to have a chat with Patrick about it, he edited part 1 once,
perhaps he might fix the formatting himself, when he applies the errata.
Otherwise it seems a double work finding the spots.
> PPS: Also, according to WG6 minutes I've seen, there is an understanding
> that I don't recall but that is to the effect that those IS 26300 defect
> reports we resolve by specifying "implementation dependence" are expected to
> be repaired in ODF 1.2 (not sure what that means).
> In any case, we might want to spawn some ODF 1.2 sub-issues that track the
> ODF 1.0 and 1.1 handled ones to ensure that there is no regression in 1.2.
Regarding the "implementation dependence", I would like to know how the
TC wants me as an editor to handle


> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 16:25
> To: Svante Schubert
> Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [office] Errata ballot or new revision?
> Hi Svante,
> Before I start a new Errata ballot, did you want to submit a new revision? 
>  I know there was some further discussion in WG6.  If we can include that 
> feedback now, before the ballot starts, it will be better, I think. 
> -Rob
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]