[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (OFFICE-1096) PublicComment: Re: [office-comment] OASIS ODF 1.0 + Errata 01 != ISO/IEC 26300 +Errata 01
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=21576#action_21576 ]
Dennis Hamilton edited comment on OFFICE-1096 at 9/24/10 11:16 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To be clear about what Rob has said in his comment, the defects this comment refers to have been reflected in IS 26300:2006. IS 26300:2006 is based on an edition of ODF 1.0 (the ed.2 Committee Specification) that incorporated the resolution of the defects from the balloting on IS 26300.
Since ODF 1.1 also reflects those resolutions, there is really no need to go back and make errata against OASIS ODF 1.0 for those defects.
I am resolving this issue as "No Action." The fix was in ODF 1.0 (second edition).
[It is unfortunate that the errata items being mentioned somehow vanished from the Errata document we now have as ODF 1.0 Errata, but I see no reason to do anything about it at this point. It is more important to accomplish the ODF 1.1 alignment with IS 26300 and then also see what consistency is required in ODF 1.2 based on existing Errata items and promises for future resolution.
was (Author: orcmid):
To be clear about what Rob has said in his comment, the no defects this comment refers to have been reflected in IS 26300:2006. IS 26300:2006 is based on an edition of ODF 1.0 (the ed.2 Committee Specification) that incorporated the resolution of the defects from the balloting on IS 26300.
Since ODF 1.1 also reflects those resolutions, there is really no need to go back and make errata against OASIS ODF 1.0 for those defects.
I am resolving this issue as "No Action." The fix was in ODF 1.0 (second edition).
[It is unfortunate that the errata items being mentioned somehow vanished from the Errata document we now have as ODF 1.0 Errata, but I see no reason to do anything about it at this point. It is more important to accomplish the ODF 1.1 alignment with IS 26300 and then also see what consistency is required in ODF 1.2 based on existing Errata items and promises for future resolution.
> Public Comment: Re: [office-comment] OASIS ODF 1.0 + Errata 01 != ISO/IEC 26300 + Errata 01
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1096
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1096
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Locale
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Robert Weir
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: ODF 1.0 (second edition)
>
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> Original date: 2 Sep 2008 15:17:30 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200809/msg00001.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]