RE: [office] OFFICE-1096 OASIS ODF 1.0 + Errata 01 != ISO/IEC 26300 + Errata 01

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Uh, didn't you check the Errata to see?  That would be handy.  [Oh I see,
this is not an defect report but a question about a previous Errata document
that was replaced by Part 1 of the one we have now.]

We do have the fact that OFFICE-3262 did not get handled in the CD05 version
we just approved.  I must put in a NEEDS-DISCUSSION on that.

We have run afoul of the business about setting things fixed does not mean
the fix has been applied or, because of the way we do things, whether there
is any consensus that the fix is correct.  Grr.  So the only thing to do is
look at whether it is applied and correct in the result or not and then find
some way to make the issue be other than resolved in order to track further
repair.  I will see what I can do about OFFICE-3262.

 - Dennis

PS: I looked at OFFICE-1096.  I set it as resolved with the explanatory
comment you will see on the end.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas J. Guelzow [mailto:andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 21:55
To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office] OFFICE-1096 OASIS ODF 1.0 + Errata 01 != ISO/IEC 26300 +
Errata 01

Hi,

does anybody know whether "Public Comment: Re: [office-comment] OASIS
ODF 1.0 + Errata 01 != ISO/IEC 26300 + Errata 01" was fixed in the last
ODF1.0 Errata CD6 or whether it is still outstanding?

We should eithe rclose it as fixed or retarget it to ODF 1.0 ERRATA CD6.

Andreas
-- 
Andreas J. Guelzow
Concordia University College of Alberta