[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] RE: XAdES support in ODF
Hi David, I totally agree, and like mentioned before, every *file* (including the 0-length current.xml) has been signed in the example :-) If there's another *file* that should have been signed (but isn't), can you please give an example ? That's probably something we've missed and then we'll correct it in our application. Thanks. So that leaves us with zip entries like "Configurations/menubar/", if they are to be signed, then it should IMHO be reflected in the spec (I wouldn't call this "a file", and the spec only says "shall contain a <ds:Reference> element for each *file*" - 1.2cd05 part 1, but perhaps I'm misinterpreting "file" in this context) Regarding files not affecting content or appearance, I think it's not possible to be sure that a file does not ever change content or appearance (might be implementation-specific), and signing applications may not even have the slightest idea how ODF could be rendered (like our eID component: it parses some XML and adds signatures, that's it) Best regards, Bart ________________________________________ From: David LeBlanc [dleblanc@exchange.microsoft.com] Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 10:29 PM To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; Hanssens Bart; office@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Cornelis Frank Subject: RE: [office] RE: XAdES support in ODF Right, but the current spec (which I did not change) says that everything should be signed. This would include 0-length files because if they got something in them, this would be a change. If there are files that do not affect content or appearance, then we may not sign these, and should document them as such. Sent from my phone, but I might be verbose - I have a keyboard... -----Original Message----- From: Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:07 PM To: David LeBlanc <dleblanc@exchange.microsoft.com>; 'Hanssens Bart' <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>; office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org> Cc: 'Cornelis Frank' <Frank.Cornelis@fedict.be> Subject: RE: [office] RE: XAdES support in ODF You're right, the Configurations2\accelerator\current.xml should have been signed, and it was. Oddly, they used the default transformation, but I guess that is tolerable considering it is a 0-length file. So I don't think they missed any that they weren't supposed to. They even signed the mimetype, Thumbnails/thumbnail.png, manifest.rdf and META-INF/manifest.xml. It looks like everything was signed that could be. - Dennis
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]