[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-3458) ODF 1.2 CD05-1 5.4.2<text:section-source> incompletely defined
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=21875#action_21875 ] Michael Brauer commented on OFFICE-3458: ---------------------------------------- Dennis: Regarding: The current schema *requires* that there is either a <text:section-source> element or the dde-source element. That's not the case. The schema fragment is: <define name="text-section"> <element name="text:section"> <ref name="text-section-attlist"/> <choice> <ref name="text-section-source"/> <ref name="text-section-source-dde"/> <empty/> </choice> <zeroOrMore> <ref name="text-content"/> </zeroOrMore> </element> </define> The first choice next to text:section-source and text.section-source-dde also allows <empty/> which means "no element". One could also write this as <optional> <choice> <ref name="text-section-source"/> <ref name="text-section-source-dde"/> </choice> </choice> > ODF 1.2 CD05-1 5.4.2 <text:section-source> incompletely defined > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-3458 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3458 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Part 1 (Schema), Text > Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05 > Reporter: Dennis Hamilton > Assignee: Michael Brauer > Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06 > > > The schema shows all. > The definition of 5.4.2 is as follows: > """ > The <text:section-source> element indicates that an enclosed section is a linked section. > """ > But all <text:section> elements are linked sections and/or the presence of the DDE element also shows that. > WHAT I THINK AND NEEDS TO BE CONFIRMED: > The *difference* with <text:section-source> is that if it has a text:section-name attribute, that is the name of a section that is a source for the <text:section> that is the parent of the <text:section-source> element. > Now, because the xlink:href can beused instead of the text:section-name to to a fragment having an xml:id that matches, this is not the only way to gain section text from the same XML document and from a different XML document in the package. So there is no actual requirement that the link is to an "external" document or one that is not very close by. > ABOUT xlink:show="embed" PROBLEMS > My understanding of that default/only value is that this means the included content is to be rendered as if it were there in place of the <text:section-source> element -- that is how [XLink] defines the xlink:show="embed" case. > What we really want, here, is that it is rendered in place of the <text:section> element. Or, put differently, it is cached *in* the <text:section> element and it is the cache that is rendered. > IS THAT IT? WE NEED TO SAY SO. > Then section 5.4.1 needs to be adjusted to be more clear about what the cases are, perhaps via OFFICE-3386. This should be discussed along with OFFICE-3386. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]